I think the markings on the left mean "Bikes Run Intersections"Bike zealots are now spreading their tired propaganda
at City Council meetings [NYT]. "A group of cycling advocates wondered why the city would reject a nimble, environmentally friendly mode of transportation in favor of bulky, polluting automobiles."
Biking in NYC has zero environmental benefit, and adds bikes without subtracting cars because nearly all riders come off mass transit, not out of cars. And "nimble" is right -- bikers typically ignore vehicle traffic rules and behave like high speed pedestrians.
Councilman James Vacca says "Nobody disagrees that using more bicycles is a good thing," but I beg to differ. Biking is good for bikers and no one else, especially not for NYC pedestrians who already need eyes in the back of their head.
And it's no surprise that Bloomberg's facade-building traffic commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan plans "a major advertising campaign featuring celebrities" to get bikers to behave. (If it works I suggest they get rid of all the traffic lights, stop signs and traffic cops, and treat all vehicle traffic the same way...)
Then bike zealots "argued that the lanes encourage a safer, more environmentally friendly mode of transportation while making the city safer for pedestrians." What a crock; with bikers constantly on the sidewalk, running lights and signs, going the wrong way, and shooting past from behind -- they're an aggravation to pedestrians, not protectors.
Bike zealots hope everyone ignores the reality that, in an urban environment full of pedestrians, fast-moving vehicles -- tailpipe or not -- need to move in an ordered and predictable way. The city continues to build bike infrastructure that suggests but does nothing to deliver predictable bike traffic.
Boycott BP poster plastered over the No Bikes sign
on the pedestrian side of the Manhattan BridgeIt's tiring to hear bike zealots constantly present themselves as environmental saviors and the allies of pedestrians when they are neither. Their self-serving campaign depends on the idyllic vision of a motor-free world -- reinforced by controlled events like Summer Streets -- and on building props that suggest orderly behavior -- "Bike stop lights! Just like in Europe, where they probably stop at those lights!" All you have to do is walk any distance in NYC to see that those things have nothing to do with the daily reality here.
If they really want to do something that benefits anyone but themselves, why don't they take their campaign to the suburbs, where they might really get drivers out of cars, and where there are no pedestrians in their way.